APPLIED AI FOR REGULATED INDUSTRIES
Working AI apps for high-stakes operations.
We build AI apps on the systems you already run. Standards, engineering rules, and physics ground every answer. Each one cites what it came from. When they disagree, it stops.
In weeks, not quarters.
OPERATIONS CORTEX
THE SYSTEMS YOU ALREADY RUN
ENGINEERING
- P&ID · DEXPI
- Datasheets
- 3D · CAD
MAINTENANCE
- Work orders
- Asset register
- Inspections
PROCESS
- Historian · PI
- OPC-UA
- Alarms
ERP
- Functional locs
- Equipment BOM
- Notifications
ONE GOVERNED MODEL
reconciled · typed · versioned
STANDARDS
- API 2510 Table 2
- NFPA 30 · 6.6.4
- OSHA 1910.106
ENGINEERING RULES
- Crane operation safety
- Exclusion overlap
- Vertical clearance
PHYSICS
- r(h) = boom · (1 − h/H)
- breach if dist < radius
- 3D separation
DETERMINISTIC CHECKS
STANDARDS-BACKED ANSWERS
FULL AUDIT TRAIL
GROUND IT
The systems you already run. One governed model. Every code it answers to.
The same vessel is a tag in DEXPI, a row on a datasheet, and a functional location in ERP. We reconcile them onto one asset, type it to a concept, and bind it to the clauses that govern it. Watch a record land, and read the evidence for why it resolved that way.
ASK IT
Ask it a question. The answer is a path you can read.
A question resolves along a path: the asset, the hazard class its zone has to keep clear, the radius the clause requires, and the clause itself. Each hop is a rule binding one thing to the next, so the path you see is the audit trail.
PROVE IT
The model is not in the decision path.
An agent decides what to look at. The answer itself is computed from geometry, formulas, and cited clauses read off the governed model, so running it twice gives you the same answer twice. It is also how the system can tell when two of its sources disagree.
Does the new 230 kV crossing at County Route 9 meet NESC clearance?
DETERMINISTIC · NO MODEL IN THE DECISION PATH
- Locate the span and structures in the live modelCKT-230A · STR-014 → STR-015 located01 / 04
- Read design, geometry, and live state from the systems of recordsag-tension model, span geometry, conductor temperature02 / 04
- Traverse the knowledge graph, binding the governed rulesNESC 232 · Table 232-1 · Utility DS-20403 / 04
- Evaluate the cited rules and assemble the audit trail4 clauses cited · every step reproducible04 / 04
Can V-101 be set where the layout puts it, next to D-101?
HOW THE NUMBER WAS PRODUCED
r(h) = boom × (1 − h / crane_height)
r = 15.0 × (1 − 3.0 / 30.0)
crane_swing_radius · Crane operation safety · check it by hand
ESCALATE
When the codes disagree, it stops.
Three authorities, three numbers, and one of them would weaken the code. There is no safe way to average that, so it goes to an engineer with the conflict shown.
Most AI will answer anyway. A confident wrong number is the failure this industry actually pays for, and it is the first thing a regulator asks about.
GRID CLEARANCE ASSESSMENT
WORKED EXAMPLE
What ground clearance applies to the 12 kV underbuild at the same crossing?
THREE AUTHORITIES, IN CONFLICT
HUMAN REVIEW REQUIRED
Routed to an engineer, with the conflict shown.
One of these would weaken the code, and there is no safe way to average them.
BUILT TO BE TRUSTED
AI you can put in front of a regulator.
Cited
Every answer traces to the governing clause.
Reproducible
Deterministic rules keep the model out of the decision path.
A person in the loop
Conflicts and ambiguity escalate. They are never guessed.
Audited
A complete trail connects the rule, facts, and source systems.
THE THINKING BEHIND IT
We have written down why this works the way it does.
A HIGH-STAKES USE CASE IN MIND?
We will help you ship it. Enterprise-ready, in weeks.
We work alongside your team to ground it in the systems you run and the standards you answer to.